Showing posts with label Michael Simkins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Simkins. Show all posts
Wednesday, 19 July 2017
Review Dessert
Dessert
by Oliver Cotton
The Last Supper
http://southwarkplayhouse.co.uk/
There's a real hunger for plays with a new take on financial inequality and the state we're in. But there has to be a fresh insight and Oliver Cotton's new play, Dessert, directed by Sir Trevor Nunn, seems curiously dated and unrigorous in its analysis.
Financier Sir Hugh Fennell (Michael Simkins) and his wife Gill (Alexandra Gilbreath) are domiciled in the UK in a palatial spread surrounded by a collection of paintings.
They are entertaining an equally affluent Connecticut business associate Wesley Barnes (Stuart Milligan) and his blonde, dippy wife Meredith (Teresa Banham).
And they've just reached dessert.
Loyal factotum Roger (Graham Turner) is about to serve the cheese, after they've gorged on something delicious in a tarragon sauce, when their smug bonhomie is suddenly plunged literally into darkness.
Afghanistan veteran Eddie (Stephen Hagan), terribly maimed during active service, invades their dining room with a gun, having disabled the mansion's electricity and security system.
He's demanding justice for his stroke-ridden newsagent father who had put all his and his wife's life savings into a Fennell company which subsequently collapsed and from which Sir Hugh had walked away.
We were wondering about the dramatist's choice of the newsagent trade for Eddie's Dad - itself under siege from supermarkets for its core products - print newspapers (which have their own problems), cigarettes and lottery tickets.
However this never developed into anything, although there was, late on, peculiarly a variation on the six Ws, taught to all trainee journalists, which also appears in Ink this season.
We guess it was deliberate that at the start a meal was made, in all senses of the word, of a variety of culinary herbs and that Sir Hugh's surname is Fennell, but we don't for the life of us know why. It's that kind of show.
If it had then become a full-blown satire, with or without herbs, it might have gripped us. But even the trigger event for Eddie seems wildly implausible in a jarring way.
Newsagents have a professional association which also gives some financial pointers. Presumably Eddy's parents were not the only alleged victims of Sir Hugh and his (unmentioned) lawyers and accountants.
Surely, in the age of the internet, those who had lost their money would organise themselves into a pressure group and even, heaven forbid, contact the press?
But it seems that Eddie's Mum and Dad instead flailed from solicitor to (self) regulatory bodies which were mentioned.
This is a bit of a clunky criticism on our part, picking on what some might see as a small part of the play. Nevertheless, we do feel it's indicative of the comedy drama's force-fed scenarios which simply do not hang together.
In the midst of being held hostage, each of the diners, the hostage taker and the Man Friday launch into speeches filled with a set of under developed, under researched passing references to issues.
Not even a moment when a tap on a glass chimes like the New York Stock Exchange bell can save this play. We get the soundbites but no fresh insights.
On the plus side, a fine cast do what they can with the woefully underdeveloped material and thinly-drawn characters they've been handed. There's also a handsome set from Rachel Stone evoking the mansion and its picture gallery.
Yes, there's been Enron, Bernie Madoff, the Sir Philip Green, Dominic Chappell and the Pension Protection Fund affair and now, tragically, the trail of bank-backed companies involved with the Grenfell Tower fire, amongst many others.
However Dessert feels like simplistic political agit-prop rather than an attempt to grapple wittily and dramatically with the landscape of global finance, wars in the name of defence and public goods falling into private pockets. So it's a famine rather than feast red/amber light.
Friday, 23 September 2016
Review Good Canary
Good Canary
by Zach Helm
Imitation Of Life
https://www.rosetheatrekingston.org/
Hollywood comes to Kingston Upon Thames with publicity justifiably headlining "John Malkovich Directs" in UPPER CASE above the title of the play, Good Canary. Although we should add the two leads, Skins' Freya Mavor and Harry Lloyd each get a photo and equal size lettering.
But then again, this play by Zach Helm (he gets equal size lettering below the title) has been pet project of the Hollywood star for some time. It was first performed in a French translation at the Théâtre Comedia in Paris and then, in Spanish, as El Buen Canaria at Mexico City's Teatro de los Insurgentes.
Now the Rose Theatre hosts the English language world première. Writer Jack (Lloyd) suddenly achieves the overnight fame dreamt of by many an aspiring novelist. After a glowing review by critic Mulholland (an acerbic Simon Wilson), Jack's gritty (and read for that, pretty filthy) novel shoots to top of the bestseller list.
But, in the opinion of the New York literati, his new best friends, Jack comes with baggage. Annie (Mavor), Jack's wife, is the centre of his life but she is also a bulimic junkie, hooked on amphetamines with a tendency to slice through the chauvinist small talk at deal-making dinner parties with a mixture of insight and violent insults - or rather, violent insults and insight in that order.
This is indeed a slickly directed play with Mavor giving a tour-de-force performance in a role not unlike that of Denise Gough in People, Places & Things. Lloyd as Jack manages the tricky balance as the supportive husband and ambitious career-climber. It is he who gives her the caged yellow canary (a live one on stage!) of the play's title.
The canary, we are told through words projected on the backdrop at the beginning, was used by miners to warn if the air was filling with toxic gases. However, by the end of the play, when the canary appears to have fluttered away, we weren't quite sure what exactly this signified, although we had a rough idea that Annie was equated to the caged bird.
The set by Pierre-François Limbosch is inventive and sets up its own visual discussion on the clichéd relationship of art and a tormented life. There is a clever use of projections and the backdrop is brushed with painterly daubs. Equally, there is an evocation of at least one famously anguished painting.
A café with adjacent road in New York, seen in different scenes from outside and inside, has a resemblance to Montmartre's paintings for tourists. Characters exit scenes stepping out of frames or slip out as if between the canvases of two paintings. At one point, a publisher's office and the couple's sparsely furnished apartment even slide together to resemble the archetypal poverty-stricken artist's garret.
Yet this, with the music by Nicolas Errèra and sound design by Jon Nicholls, somehow still serves to emphasize the cinematic nature of the script. We couldn't help thinking this was a movie that was never made. There's an attempt to make a virtue out of this - the use of surtitles instead of speech signifies the start of a slide into predominantly visual melodrama reminiscent of silent movies.
Sylvia (Sally Rogers), the wife of the wealthy publisher out to lure Jack into his publishing house, feels like a character which would benefit from being in a movie rather than a stage version, especially with scenes split between two rooms and groups of characters.
There is also a subtle time mash up feel. Publisher Charlie (a strikingly charismatic performance by Shepherd) could have stepped out of the 1960s. Drug dealer Jeff (Ilan Goodman combining shambling geniality and a belief he's in business rather than a criminal enterprise) could be from a 1980s' police procedural.
The dialogue of the wealthier publisher Stuart (marvellously glib Michael Simkins) apparently with the money for a lucrative advance and critic Mulholland has the feel of pre-internet unguarded comment.
We did sense, however, particularly when Stuart, having admitted that he'd not read Jack's novel, later proudly announces he has read Chapter 7 (ambiguous in the USA with its meaning of insolvency) that there might be another hidden plot to the Good Canary.
So all in all, it's well directed and acted, even if the script leaves a few too many question marks. We're still not sure what happened to that cute little bird, but TLT and her sidekick in their own cheep and cheerful way award a canary-coloured amber light for an evening with plenty of highlights.
Wednesday, 6 May 2015
Review Hay Fever
Hay Fever
Perhaps the family itself is a construct for the press. This is a play which delights in its own technical prowess and nuts and bolts. Maybe
the father of the family David Bliss’s definition of his work in this febrile
international atmosphere, where novelists, actors, playwrights, artists, diplomats,
sportsmen, newspapers, critics (!!) and anyone with a secret play a dangerous tactical game,
is sinister:
by Noël Coward
Bohemian Rhapsody
Bohemian Rhapsody
http://www.atgtickets.com/shows/hay-fever/duke-of-yorks/
“Why is Hay Fever called Hay Fever?”, mused TLT and her ruminating roadster about Noël Coward’s play, still in preview, as they gazed at the white stucco facade of the Duke of York’s Theatre in the heart of London’s theatreland.
“Why is Hay Fever called Hay Fever?”, mused TLT and her ruminating roadster about Noël Coward’s play, still in preview, as they gazed at the white stucco facade of the Duke of York’s Theatre in the heart of London’s theatreland.
Barely two hours later, after the final curtain, this exquisitely
structured, melodic (and like Private Lives), “comedy of bad manners”, written by a young Coward in 1924 following a
trip to the USA, nevertheless struck us as rather sinister (or should that be, in
Coward’s case, dexter?).
Are we meant to infer hay fever as feverish disruption and disarray? Or sexual
peccadillos as in “a roll in the hay”? Or was it already slang for marijuana or
cannabis or for ready cash? Or should we reach for the
anti-histamines? And what about scenes where house guests “play up” to hosts
from hell like sane detainees in a mental home feigning madness to advance the career of the chief
psychiatrist?
The seemingly kooky hosts, inappropriately surnamed Bliss, reside
in a manor house on The Wind In The Willows banks of the River Thames in the village of Cookham.
The Bohemian “independent family”: Veteran
actress – and tippler --planning-a-comeback Judith (Felicity Kendal as a
delicious domestic tyrant); Pot-boiler novelist David (Simon Shepherd looking
just a tad like Coward biographer, the late Sheridan Morley) and late teens’
children Simon (boisterous Edward Franklin) and Sorel (boyishly played by Alice
Orr-Ewing) settle down for the weekend, each having, unknown to the others,
invited a guest.
For Judith, Simon and, more ambiguously, Sorel, love trysts
with a hearty sportsman, Sandy Tyrrell (a Wodehousian Edward Killingback), a
society vamp (authoritative Sara Stewart) and diplomat Richard Greatham (willing-to-break-protocol-by-the-play's-end Michael
Simkins) are respectively on the cards.
Meanwhile David wants to “observe” a young female flapper,
Jackie Coryton (an equally pitch perfect performance by Celeste Dodwell) as a
prototype for a character in his novel. Funny – but rather sinister.
Coward famously said of Hay Fever that “it has little plot
and remarkably little action”.
Well, maybe at its own 1925 opening, there were more than enough plots going in countries mentioned in the play: Spain (military dictatorship and bullfights),
Italy (dictatorship and lira crisis),
Japan (Imperial Royal Family and US immigration quota)
and Russia (Soviet Union? 1920s? Enough said).
As Coward added, the play depends on “expert technique from
each and every member of the cast”. But in TLT and her automotive sidekick’s
opinion, every character, including dresser cum housekeeper Clara (Mossie
Smith), who by the end has participated by proxy in the world of
international finance, is inventing his or her own plots, trying to best the other characters. Plus it’s difficult to say how long any short-lived peace will reign.
Drawing on the music-like play structures of Bernard Shaw (there are more than a few Shavian references in Hay Fever), maybe there’s also a clue in the hiccups which the sportsman
Sandy Tyrell suffers in the final act.
The play hiccups along like a guffawing playwright-erly musical hocket,
an alternation of notes, pitches or chords for several voices. Hocket from the French word hoquet meaning a sudden
interruption - or hiccup.
All the characters are sucked into the playacting, the
melodramatic tropes, the creation of literary works, the coming together in,
then breaking of alliances and the injured parties. While even the apparently
bumbling diplomat doesn’t care about throwing around other people’s baggage, as
long as his own diplomatic bag is safe.
“The only reason I’ve been so annoying is that I love to see
things as they are first, and then pretend they’re what they’re not”
This Theatre Royal Bath revival directed by Lindsay
Posner benefits from a terrific Judith
Bliss in scion of a theatrical family herself, Felicity Kendal. Backed all the while, with home
county midsummer lighting (Paul Pyant) flooding through the French windows, by the finely-detailed wood-panelled galleried set
design by Peter McKintosh, becoming a character in itself.
The production has toured extensively nationwide and in
Australia before coming into the West End and shows every sign of bedding down
nicely. At the same time, it may need a look at the pacing in the first act and
some tightening to hone its brittle humour. But TLT and her hatchback are
unashamed Coward groupies and present a coveted emerald-green light.
But we still haven’t learnt the definitive explanation as
to why Hay Fever is called Hay Fever ;).
Tickets to Hay Fever courtesy of
Official Theatre www.officialtheatre.com
PS Interestingly, as well as supposedly being inspired by an American couple, actress Laurette Taylor and Anglo-Irish playwright Hartley Manners, there was a Bliss family around at the time of Hay Fever.
Between 1923 - 1925 the composer Arthur Bliss, whose career had taken off after 1918 and became famous at the same time as Coward, lived, met his wife in 1924 and married a year later in California. His wife's mother, aunt and uncle were all actors with her uncle also being a playwright. Arthur, whose American father was from Massachussets, of course shares a surname with the family in Hay Fever.
Does one mention of the name MacKenzie refer to Compton (known as "Monty") McKenzie, (writer, actor, Scottish nationalist, member of British intelligence and later supporter of the abdicated Edward VIII (along with his drug-taking brother George, Edward also knew Coward)? Compton MacKenzie's sister Fay Compton also appeared in Coward's plays. But TLT and her cabriolet are only willing to share Google search hunches with the reservation that they are definitely only vaguely circumstantial and nothing more ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)