Showing posts with label Polly Sullivan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Polly Sullivan. Show all posts
Thursday, 31 August 2017
Review Hamlet
More about kin than kings, Peter Barker is pleasantly surprised by an odd, but intriguing, fast-moving Hamlet
Hamlet
by William Shakespeare
Everything And The Kitchen Sink
https://www.parktheatre.co.uk/
Keep It In The Family could be a tongue-in-cheek alternative title for Hamlet, but the Brandreth family take it literally as the cue for their cut-down version of Shakespeare’s most celebrated play.
It's the tale of Hamlet, a self-examining Danish prince increasingly out of sync with his times after his father’s death and the sudden marriage of his mother to his uncle.
Updated to the modern age, directors Simon Evans and David Aula with script editor Imogen Bond have produced a 90-minute one-act play which has the speed of a TV drama or movie.
We're in an affluent middle-class kitchen, an attractively detailed set from Polly Sullivan, with oak cupboards, other pine furniture and a handy set of knives, just in case they're needed.
Benet Brandreth tackles the role of Hamlet, while his wife actress Kosha Engler and his Dad, Gyles, former MP and current media personality, split the rest of the roles.
By day (when he's not doing the matinées!) Benet is an intellectual property lawyer and an expert in rhetoric working with, among others, the RSC.
As might be expected, his delivery is very clear, but it's also a very different kind of interpretation - an unsympathetic, bad-tempered, entitled public schoolboy who, deliberately, often shouts his soliloquys at the audience.
Yet, he is relaxed and witty on first meeting an old university friend. Plus his rendition of "to be or not to be", first read from a philosophy book and then turned into a debate with himself, worked for me.
Gyles Brandeth captures Claudius's man-in-power hypocrisy and oily charm, as well as the complacent pomposity of Polonius, notably in the funny and realistic exchange with his son Laertes.
But here a minus kicks in. Having actors double up on the spot left me wondering if this was a dialogue between father and son or father and daughter - with both of Polonius's children acted by the otherwise excellent Kosha Engler.
Despite some entertaining programme notes by Gyles, I did wish I'd brought a Hamlet crib for my companion who came knowing nothing about the play.
We both pondered the script and directorial decisions which left Engler, for instance, doing a confusing immediate switch from garlanded Orphelia to her vengeful brother Laertes - also complete with garland. Similarly the switches between Claudius and Polonius were not always clear.
Nevertheless, there's a certain wit to the staging and a daring knife game which gives an adventurous twist to the fight scenes, sustaining the pace and tension.
Preconceptions about Brandeth senior dismissed, this proved to be an entertaining, if sometimes confusing, evening. The relatively short running time and swiftly moving action kept me hooked.
There's a certain panache to the performances of the trio and, dare I say it, Gyles Brandeth proves his acting chops and I wouldn't mind seeing more of him on the stage. There are flaws but I still enjoyed this Hamlet enough to award an amber/green light.
Tuesday, 4 July 2017
Review The Mentor
The Mentor (Der Mentor)
by Daniel Kehlmann
Translated by Christopher Hampton
The Blagger's Guide To Playwriting
https://www.nimaxtheatres.com/vaudeville-theatre/the_mentor
A celebrated veteran playwright (F Murray Abraham) at the moment finds himself mostly in movie development hell. His most famous work is the stuff of college syllabuses rather than current productions, but he has now received an invitation.
He arrives at a picturesque villa in the German countryside, complete with its own Greek chorus of chirruping birds and ribbiting frogs, as the paid for guest of literary benefactors to mentor a young dramatist (Daniel Weyman).
The younger man's career, maybe on the strength of one adulatory - or perhaps puff-atory depending on your degree of cynicism - review, has gained momentum and seems a suitable case for philanthropy.
Like some well-worn latter-day Oscar Wilde the older vainglorious Benjamin Rubin, with unnaturally dark hair matched with a grey goatee, at first throws out aphorisms he has concocted, probably as old as his most well-known work.
However Rubin quickly clashes with his not-so-willing pupil Martin Wegner, also a paid for guest, who is accompanied by his cool blonde museum chief and art historian wife Gina (Naomi Frederick).
Tempers fly and there's no way to measure who, out of Rubin and Wegner, is the greater talent or whether they have just negotiated their way through the politics of the playwriting hierarchy.
The playwright, Daniel Kehlmann, is a hugely popular German-born novelist and playwright and this is a sharp comedy of manners, positioned as a memory play, written in 2012.
It's an elegant, lucid performance both visually and aurally from Murray who turns into a kind of comico-tragic Hamlet as directed by Laurence Boswell. Yet we weren't at all sure about the play as a whole, even though the smaller role of frustrated abstract painter-turned-arts administrator Erwin Rudicek (Jonathan Cullen) also made an impression and is a deftly drawn character.
The set also partially reflects a certain abstraction. We couldn't place the location although we read afterwards it was meant to be Germany.
To our eyes the design (by Polly Sullivan) with its layered perspectives and pink villa reminded us more of a Danish or maybe a Tuscany villa than German Jugendstil also known as the-turn-of-the 20th century nouveau art.
The set is elegant and ingenious with indications of an unpainted rough draft outline alongside a naturalistic cherry blossom tree. However its indeterminate location may take away from the meaning of the play.
Indeed we have some sympathy with Rubin's frustration with the Scottish whiskey served by the foundation's administrator - The Mentor is like a blend in landscape and ideas rather than pure spirit.
Benjamin Rubin is presumably Jewish (at least on his paternal side) and it appears speaks fluent German which begs a question.
A foundation set up by a German industrialist and his family owns the villa, which itself may beg questions about the Second World War past, and runs the mentoring scheme. Against this context the profession of Wegener's attractive wife as a history of art expert and museum curator is also a loaded matter.
There are some other clues (the links contain spoilers if you're going to see the show), some rather cryptic and obscure - an allusion to a classic Austrian short story, a reference to an award named for a German Jewish critic famous for his feuds and possibly another to a celebrated German author who admitted late in life SS membership.
This may make this play, with clarinet riffs between scenes by composer Dave Price, more than a slight story of literary egos over a couple of days. But blink, and you'll miss these hints.
It's 80 or so minutes long and before the final moments we were re-imagining it as a movie, mildly in the style of A Bigger Splash, where a director could relish the landscape and plant visual clues.
As it is, in a play, the allusions to German language literature in the early twentieth century and a rather savage subtext feel way too subtle and the comedy drama too abstract.
It would make sense if it were envisaged as going on to be a movie. Yet, as indicated, albeit couched in the flashback to a comic battle between the older and younger generation, The Mentor does evoke unexpectedly the feel of past ghosts and unresolved matters.
We think we are justified at teasing this meaning out, bearing in mind the playwright Kehlmann's own background with a father who survived partly as a beneficiary of a confused paper trail laid out by the writer's grandparents.
The geographical vagueness does the play no favours, but we did laugh at the playwriterly neuroses and pondered the change from pen and ink to scripts on computer and possible connections to Greek comedy. It's smart, sophisticated and a well-performed entertainment, but also unsatisfying, so it's an amber light.
Friday, 28 April 2017
Review Educating Rita
Educating Rita
by Willy Russell
Trading Places
http://www.queens-theatre.co.uk/
Just think, back in the day Rita could have studied Computing and Batch Processing at The Open University and Educating Rita would have been a completely different play ... 😵
Before the age of the internet, the Open University was a means for those who had left school at 15 and been in work to return to education part time as mature students working for a degree. It used radio and television, as well as face-to-face tutorials, to teach students arts and science subjects.
Rita (Danielle Flett), born circa 1954, probably was one of the 15 year olds who were never considered to be university material and left a secondary modern school to take up an apprenticeship as a hairdresser.
Now the play is even a GCSE school set text so, in a sense, Educating Rita itself has become part of the pathway to university and a reflection of a changed educational hierachy.
Rita has plucked up the courage to defy the scorn of her husband and start an Open University course in English Literature. Frank (Ruairi Conaghan) is the lecturer and frustrated poet, whose profession at the time is one of the few (journalism in that era was another) which also allows him to be a functioning alcoholic.
The Open University wasn't free, but considerably cheaper than going away for a degree, allowing the student to hold down a full time job and study, attending tutorials at a local centre, in this case one of the redbrick universities.
The play is a two hander written just when cuts and increased fees were making the Open University a little less open. So superficially (that's not a criticism) it's also a nostalgic look back to a more idealistic time.
Director Ros Philips's production transfers the action from Liverpool to Essex which has seemingly a minimal effect on the script - Formby becomes Maldon.
However it may be worth noting Liverpool University was founded as one of the first redbrick universities in one of the major ports of British Empire trade - it's where Heathcliff is found in Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights. Of course it's possible to make Rita a 1980 Essex girl with origins in London's East End and London's docks, but it needs to be carefully thought through.
The performances themselves are workmanlike but somewhat clunky in the first act. We also felt that the middle-aged tutor would have been more awestruck and flustered - even if trying to hide it - when Rita walks into the room. Their physical types seemed to demand it.
Rita is a stunning, sexy, statuesque brunette in her stillettos with legs up to her armpits whom one feels a model agency talent scout would immediately snap up. He is a shorter grey haired and bearded academic, already living with an ex-student after a failed marriage.
So it felt that a misplaced awe of academia had rather overwhelmed the production and that just the merest frisson and awkwardness from the tutor would have made it more convincing. The two actors took a while to relax into their roles, occasionally over-emphatic and with some muffled diction.
This also muted some of the offstage action. We did want the setbacks to seem more of a disaster, the obstacles higher and the chance of overcoming them to be more in jeopardy in this production.
Still the humour and transformation of the play work their magic, as does the clever merging of novels and real life which makes an impact, adding depth without the audience needing to catch on to the literary references. Rita's costume changes, always a vital component in the staging of this play, are simple but effective (the Queen's Theatre wardrobe department under Nicola Thomas).
In our times, with the old polytechnics now respected universities and now many more graduates, the attitude of the first half of the play, without knowing the school and college circumstances of 1980 and before, can feel rather patronizing.
But Rita is already a graduate of a hierachical education system. She's probably an 11 plus reject who teachers regarded as not fit for university. To cap it all, she has an offstage obdurate husband who could be a minor character in an Angry Young Man novel of the 1950s.
There may be ways and means of communicating the upheaval in education in the past without interfering with the script, perhaps replacing the 1970s' and 1980s' music inserted between scenes here.
The second act is by far the stronger for Flett's Rita. We begin to see her mind whirring as the avalanche of new experiences pours over her and she eventually starts to try and separate fact from fiction.
Conaghan has Frank's wry, dry manner down to a tee with the potential for a tinge of academic malice, but he can afford to tone down some of the drunk scenes as someone who has held down a job for years while drinking steadily until an eventual spectacular lapse.
Educating Rita does require a balancing act. It has both a naturalistic quality (naturally exploited in the celebrated movie) and a darker, much less optimistic symbolic thread, both visually and in the text. Especially with the distorted image of women both as literary characters or, in the case of female writers, as almost inevitably neurotic and/or spinsterish and tragic.
The influence of this body of literature, going hand in hand with how the medical and legal professions have viewed women, gives the play its heft, particularly in the second act. Even to the extent of there being a veiled suggestion that the power of literary fiction may still be a trap, a malign influence or a means of controlling women, while the men escape scot free.
The power dynamics feel rather blunted in this production. Nevertheless, perhaps we can thank the female-dominated hairdressing profession, where playwright Willy Russell started out, as well as his experiences as a mature student, for some of the darker insights and humour regarding professional and personal issues. For a welcome new production, it's an amber light.
Monday, 30 January 2017
Review Years of Sunlight (Preview)
Years of Sunlight
by Michael McLean
The Likely Lads
https://theatre503.com/
One of TLT's relatives once worked in Port Sunlight, a factory and a model village providing comfortable housing for its workers in Cheshire, near to Liverpool, built late in the 19th century. This parallelled similar Victorian projects such as Cadbury's Bournville and the much earlier New Lanark in Scotland.
In a sense, this part of the TLT clan was going backward in time. For before Port Sunlight, he and his new wife had first moved into a maisonette near London in one of the many New Towns, part of a post Second World War attempt for a planned welfare state, set up not by a company but by national and local government.
So it was with her curiosity piqued, TLT parked her thespian jalopy at the Theatre503 for a preview performance of Years of Sunlight. This is set not in Port Sunlight, but a post World War II overspill Lancashire new town for Liverpool workers, namely Skelmersdale.
The play charts the lives of friends over 30 years until 2010: Paul (Mark Rice-Oxley), the child of an Irish single mother Hazel (Miranda Foster) conceived in Ireland, and artistically talented Emlyn (Bryan Dick).
Emlyn lives in a children's home before being fostered on the same estate where Hazel, who watches out for him, and Paul live. Both Paul and Emlyn are children, we learn eventually, of the New Town and both have a chance of upward mobility, skewed in various ways.
The play itself works its way backwards in time and, despite this structure, feels much like a soap opera. However writer Michael McLean intelligently works in a more explicit entertainment and pre-Murdoch newspaper industry theme.
Paul's golf-playing printer stepfather Bob (memorable John Biggins), ultimately hobbled in a fate reflecting his earlier charitable activities, could equally have stepped out of as a boss in a 1950s' 'angry young man' novel or a Dickens' tale..
In addition, threaded alongside this, as far as we could tell, there is a subtle subtext drawing in the impact of arts' funding on both sides of the Irish Sea.
Seared Productions in association with the Theatre503 presents Years of Sunlight. The drama is directed skilfully by Amelia Sears with great clarity, aided by Polly Sullivan's deft, clever design. A granite pillar, a raised platform at an angle on the stage has cloud-like painterly daubs on either side. Video news projections reflect the changes over years, real-life and artistic fracturing.
This is a modest, rewarding play, a little schematic at times, but with plenty of potential - we did feel it might have another life on screen. The 75-minute, one-act drama has an outstanding performance by Bryan Dick as Emlyn with strong performances also from Mark Rice-Oxley and Miranda Foster.
At the same time, without wanting to give anything away, the new town theme did not always feel organically knitted in. So it lacked the final lump-in-the-throat poignancy and feel of lost promise for which it was clearly striving in the preview we saw.
At its best Years of Sunlight reflects in its story the sly ambivalence found in contemporary narration of genuine 1960s' Skelmersdale Development Corporation film footage, shown in the play, promoting the brave new world. It's an amber/green light for a tale of good intentions and sad outcomes.
Saturday, 5 November 2016
Review Deny, Deny, Deny
A new play, which imagines a future where drugs' cheating on the athletics track mutates into genetic manipulation, eventually wins over Francis Beckett.
by Jonathan Maitland
Frankenstein Off The Starting Blocks
http://parktheatre.co.uk
The pressure for an athlete to give his or her body something to enhance its speed or strength is, quite simply, that the others are doing it; and if you don’t do it too, they will beat you.
That’s the clinching argument, put by runner Eve’s coach in this strong new play set in the near future, and Eve reluctantly succumbs to it.
She agrees to treatment which will interfere with her genes – treatment she is assured will not show up in blood tests, for the doping police are condemned always to be playing catch-up.
“What’s the Russian word for sportsmanlike?” a character asks. “I don’t know.” “That’s because there isn’t one.” But of course it’s not just the Russians. It’s everyone.
Eve’s slow and reluctant descent into cheating is well-drawn, especially in one powerful scene between her and her coach, and the tension you feel watching it is no less because you know what the outcome will be.
The effect on her – the ruin of everything good in her life except for her victories – is laid out starkly on the stage.
Eve is played magnificently by Juma Sharkah, who manages by an inflection here, a movement there, to show the two great changes that overtake her.
First, when she moves from being a clean athlete to being a cheat and then after the end of her career. It is a performance of great sensitivity and assurance.
Rona, her coach, is far harder for an actor, and for that I blame the author. He writes in the programme that she was based on three people, Peter Mandelson, Rasputin and his mother, and perhaps that is the problem.
She is required to be clever, manipulative, persuasive and charismatic, and at the same time self-destructive, hysterical and unable to prevent herself from saying the uncontrolled things which will only damage her cause.
Zoe Waites chooses to act the former persona, dealing as best she can with the lines demanding the latter. It’s a fine effort from a very good actor. Nevertheless, no actor can make the character entirely convincing until the author takes another look at the script.
There is not a weak link in the cast with Daniel Fraser as Eve’s journalist boyfriend, Shvorne Marks as a fellow athlete, and Sarah Finigan as everyone else – most notably a sports official – all putting in convincing performances.
The author rightly identifies in the programme the biggest challenge facing any director of this play: “Conveying something of the reality of a major race at a huge global sporting event. Not easy when the play is in the round and there’s a limited budget.”
The solution from director Brendan O’Hea and designer Polly Sullivan is brilliant and devastatingly simple: a stage floor, underlit and divided into squares, capable of being everything, including a track for a running race. It’s quite enough to suspend disbelief for two hours.
However, the character of Rona is not the only problem with the script. The scene in which a sports official investigates Eve is hampered by the fact that the author has not decided whether Eve is to say she did not do it, or that she did it, and so what?
I am also not quite sure I am happy about the fact that both athletes are black, and all the other characters are white (a script issue, not the result of colour-blind casting.)
But overall, this is a very fine new play with a harsh contemporary feel, directed with great flair and acted with conviction. A green light from me.
Friday, 26 August 2016
Review The Roundabout
The Roundabout
By JB Priestley
A Day In The Country
Watching
the rare revival of this 1931 play, a naughty thought crossed the mind of TLT.
What if JB Priestlley, Oscar Wilde (from beyond the grave), Bernard Shaw and Kaufman and Hart, the
latter probably by wire across the Atlantic, had got together and decided to
write a piece for the stage as if one playwright and as a game of consequences?
For
that's exactly what the plot and dialogue felt for us in this drawing room
comedy, written originally for actress Peggy Ashcroft during a short-lived love affair with Priestley. Ashcroft passed on it and a subsequent production was mounted
in Liverpool.
It's
a strange, uneven script, given a solid production directed
by Hugh Ross at Finsbury Park's Park Theatre, with an oddly mechanically zingy aphoristic feel, where the characters
are vastly stronger than the plot.
Aristocrat
and financier Lord Kettlewell (Brian Protheroe), although maintaining a
substantial country house household, is insolvent and trying to reduce costs by
discarding his mistress Hilda Lancicort (Carol Starks).
In the
midst of his travails, he is ambushed by the arrival of his long-lost daughter
Pamela (Bessie Carter), from whom, along with her mother Rose (Lisa Bowerman),
he has been estranged for many years.
Pamela
has arrived after a trip to the Soviet Union, bringing with her fellow
communist Staggles (Steven Blakeley) whose tough ideological stance disguises a
rather more illegitimate appreciation of capitalist wine and women.
An appreciation which oversteps the mark
when he presses his unwanted attentions on the pretty maidservant Alice (Annie Jackson), behaving more like a
licentious eighteenth century nobleman than then adherent of an austere cause bringing equality to the masses.
The frailest of plots has a set simply but effectively indicating a Tudor-style mansion
with overarching beams (designer:Polly Sullivan). But couched somewhere beneath
it all is an a subtext dwelling on shifts in power - from painting and theatre
to the mechanised medium of film, from silent movies to sound, the failure of
the Soviet ideal, international politics alongside economic woes.
All
entangled as Parsons the butler (Derek Hutchinson), who has his own run of good
luck cruelly snatched away, drunkenly observes, "in a shtate of gre-aet
social confusion".
Nevertheless
there's an oddly self conscious feel to the shifts as well in style and tone in
the writing. While jolie laide Pamela pushes the plot along, the mournfully
humorous leftover of imperial Edwardian Britain, down-at-heel idler Churton Saunders
(Hugo Sachs) is like a silent movie character with a clear view but bypassed by
events, but still tolerated on a small stipend on the studio lot.
Meantime
the inpecunious widowed Lady Knightsbridge (Richenda Carey) shows an imperiously
focussed saleswoman manner in drumming up business for her family with her own
take on political events: "Communists, eh? Is there any money in it,
because I'm looking for something for Agatha's younger girl - dreadfully plain,
poor thing!".
Maybe the
play was caught halfway between theatre and cinema and its own push between
agitprop and entertainment.
Comrade
Staggles, a character in Blakeley's performance still with a decidedly modern if caricatural
feel in our times, ostensibly talks about the bloated capitalist classes when
we know Lord Kettlewell is on his uppers.
But
Staggles could just as well to be talking about the fake life of luxury portrayed
on the big screen, "this rich, artificial sort of life, where you're eating
and drinking all day, and all the women are parading their sexual charms."
So, a bit
of a curio in the Priestley canon in a production which sometimes still has to
find its rhythm but with strong enough characterisations and performances to
carry it through to the upper ranges of an amber light.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)